Current:Home > MyHow Biden's latest student loan forgiveness differs from debt relief blocked by Supreme Court -ProfitEdge
How Biden's latest student loan forgiveness differs from debt relief blocked by Supreme Court
View
Date:2025-04-19 15:32:45
Washington — The Biden administration announced Friday that it will wipe out $39 billion in student debt for more than 800,000 borrowers, relief that comes weeks after the Supreme Court invalidated a separate, broader effort by President Biden to address student loan debt.
Unlike the broad forgiveness Mr. Biden originally attempted to provide, the forthcoming debt discharges by the Department of Education are narrower, stemming from "fixes" announced by the administration in April 2022 to ensure borrowers enrolled in income-driven repayment plans have an accurate count of the number of monthly payments that go toward forgiveness.
The new student debt plan also relies on a different law than the one that was struck down by the Supreme Court. Under the 1965 Higher Education Act and federal regulations, a borrower is eligible for loan forgiveness after making 240 or 300 qualifying monthly payments — roughly 20 or 25 years of payments — on an income-driven repayment plan or standard repayment plan. The administration said "inaccurate payment counts" caused borrowers to lose "hard-earned progress" toward having their loans forgiven, which it has sought to remedy.
Loans covered include Direct Loans or Federal Family Education Loans held by the Department of Education, including Parent PLUS Loans.
The Supreme Court student loan decision
The latest announcement from the Department of Education is part of the Biden administration's efforts to provide relief to Americans with student loan debt, and is different from the program struck down by the Supreme Court late last month.
Under that plan, which the court's conservative majority said is unlawful, eligibility depended on income. Borrowers earning up to $125,000 annually could have up to $10,000 in student debt forgiven. Qualifying Pell Grant recipients, students with the greatest financial need, who met the income threshold could have had up to an additional $10,000 in relief.
That plan by the Biden administration was far more sweeping, with an estimated 40 million Americans eligible for relief, 20 million of whom would have had their loan balances erased.
The program also relied on a different law — the HEROES Act — than the loan discharges announced Friday. The HEROES Act authorizes the education secretary to "waive or modify" student financial assistance programs for borrowers "in connection" with a national emergency, such as the pandemic.
But the Supreme Court disagreed, finding the administration overstepped its authority with its plan to erase $430 billion in student debt.
The court also invoked the so-called "major questions" doctrine in part of its ruling, a legal theory that holds there must be clear congressional authorization for an executive branch agency to decide an issue of "vast economic or political significance."
The "economic and political significance" of the loan forgiveness plan, Roberts wrote, "is staggering by any measure." The court ruled that the education secretary could modify "existing statutory or regulatory provisions" under the Education Act, but "not to rewrite that statute from the ground up."
veryGood! (517)
Related
- Are Instagram, Facebook and WhatsApp down? Meta says most issues resolved after outages
- Jake Paul will fight Mike Tyson at 80,000-seat AT&T Stadium, home of the Dallas Cowboys
- Paul Simon to receive PEN America’s Literary Service Award
- Baldwin touts buy-American legislation in first Senate re-election campaign TV ad
- 'Vanderpump Rules' star DJ James Kennedy arrested on domestic violence charges
- What to know about abortion provider Dr. Caitlin Bernard, a guest at State of the Union
- Avoid seaweed blobs, red tides on Florida beaches this spring with our water quality maps
- Broncos release two-time Pro Bowl safety Justin Simmons, team's longest-tenured player
- Romantasy reigns on spicy BookTok: Recommendations from the internet’s favorite genre
- The Excerpt podcast: Alabama lawmakers pass IVF protections for patients and providers
Ranking
- 'Vanderpump Rules' star DJ James Kennedy arrested on domestic violence charges
- Britt Reid is enjoying early prison release: Remember what he did, not just his privilege
- Where to find Stanley Easter tumblers now that they've sold out
- Amy Schumer's Parenting Milestone With 4-Year-Old Son Gene Will Have You Exhausted
- Federal Spending Freeze Could Have Widespread Impact on Environment, Emergency Management
- LinkedIn users say they can't access site amid outage reports
- Cryptocurrency fraud is now the riskiest scam for consumers, according to BBB
- Burger King sweetens its create-your-own Whopper contest with a free burger
Recommendation
Selena Gomez engaged to Benny Blanco after 1 year together: 'Forever begins now'
Trump ordered to pay legal fees after failed lawsuit over ‘shocking and scandalous’ Steele dossier
USPS unveils a new stamp: See the latest design featuring former First Lady Betty Ford
What to know about abortion provider Dr. Caitlin Bernard, a guest at State of the Union
Intellectuals vs. The Internet
Baldwin touts buy-American legislation in first Senate re-election campaign TV ad
Kate Middleton's Uncle Speaks to Her Health Journey While on Celebrity Big Brother
Iowa House OKs bill to criminalize death of an “unborn person” despite IVF concerns